ONE | 縁 | Hợp Nhất — A Record of Practice

The moment I understand an exhibition most clearly is usually the moment before anyone else arrives. For ONE | 縁 it was the night before opening. Everything had finally been placed, the floor had been swept, and after months of classes, planning, construction, revisions, photographs, and conversations, the exhibition was quiet enough for us to have it to ourselves.

I spent that time walking slowly through the space and looking at each work. By then there was little left for me to correct. What interested me was trying to understand what the designer had seen: the attention given to a cut, the way a material had been finished, the space surrounding it, the craftsmanship that allowed an idea to stand on its own. Eventually I found myself asking a different question. Once technique had done its work, what remained for me to feel?

Vietnam was not the landscape of my childhood, and I did not grow up with every memory, reference, or history that some of the participants carried into their work. That distance made the experience more interesting. Could an arrangement communicate something I had not personally lived? Could the treatment of a material reveal enough of a heritage to make me curious about what lay behind it? Could the work move beyond being visually successful and create a desire to understand more?

For years I have returned to the relationship between the eyes, hands, and heart in making flowers. The eyes learn to observe: proportion, space, movement, material, and eventually the differences between what we intended and what we actually made. The hands learn through repetition, developing the ability to turn observation into structure. The heart is more difficult to teach. It is where memory, culture, emotion, instinct, and individual experience begin to enter the work. An exhibition gives us a rare opportunity to see all three operating at once.

Along one wall at ONE were 1,527 photographs made during the months before the exhibition. Most of the students represented there had been studying primarily with Ngoc Rose, Mia, and Thao, so I was not looking back through lessons I had personally taught. What I could see instead was the progress of time itself. A single photograph documented an arrangement; hundreds together began to show ideas appearing, disappearing, returning in another form, and gradually becoming more assured.

From a distance, the wall stopped behaving like a collection of separate images and became something closer to a cascade of creativity, months of making accumulating until they seemed to flow directly into the living sculptures occupying the exhibition space. The public encountered the finished works, but the photographs made visible what exhibitions normally conceal: the discarded flowers, earlier attempts, corrections, experiments, and repeated acts of looking that existed before anyone called the work complete.

This was also the first When Still exhibition in which we asked participants to take responsibility for choosing and sourcing their own materials. In earlier exhibitions, whatever we provided inevitably created a shared set of limitations. ONE removed many of those boundaries. Participants had to decide what their ideas required, search for the materials themselves, understand their limitations, and determine how far they were willing to take them.

What emerged surprised me. Greater freedom did not result in less discipline. It revealed how much discipline had already been developed. The materials felt more personal, craftsmanship became more deliberate, and decisions belonged more completely to the person making them. By opening night there was a noticeable sense of fulfillment among the students and teachers, and visitors did not need to know the curriculum behind each arrangement to recognize the amount of attention that had gone into it.

The works themselves continued changing throughout the exhibition. Flowers opened, leaves softened, branches shifted as moisture left them. Some arrangements aged beautifully, while others required constant upkeep to preserve what the designer had intended. None could be held permanently at the moment in which it opened to the public, and that ephemerality changed the way we experienced them. They asked visitors to be present because what they were looking at might already be different by the following afternoon.

The exhibition had been organized through the cycle of the moon, and by the time it was dismantled that structure had come to feel increasingly connected to the practice itself. Months of work had grown toward one public moment, became full, and then receded again as the arrangements disappeared and the space emptied. Yet the end of an exhibition is never quite an ending. A year later we will return carrying another year of lessons, memories, failed attempts, conversations, confidence, doubt, and experience. The designs will change because the people making them will have changed.

Perhaps that is what an exhibition ultimately measures. Not whether a single arrangement succeeded, but how our seeing, making, and feeling have changed since the last time we stood in front of our own work. We return to familiar materials and familiar questions, but we return with more practice in our eyes, our hands, and our hearts.

ONE marked where we were in September 2026. The next exhibition will show us what happened afterward.

← Back to When Still Journal